Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:36515] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13621/2025 Ent Bhatta Sangh Bharatpur, Through Its President Narendra Ta- lan, Son Of Shri Vinod Kumar, Aged About 45 Years, Office Kumher Road, Nadbai, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) Pin-321602 ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Depart- ment Of Mines And Geology, Secretariat, Jaipur
2. Joint Secretary, Govt Of Rajasthan, Mines (Group-2) De- partment, Secretariat, Jaipur
3. Director, Department Of Mines And Geology, Udaipur, Ra- jasthan
4. Mining Engineer, Department Of Mines And Geology, Bharatpur, Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms.Priyansha Gupta JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 10/09/2025
1. For a limited prayer, the instant writ petition has been preferred seeking direction to the respondents to decide the representation dated 03.07.2025 submitted by the petitioner.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the in spite of passing of considerable time, till date, the representation submitted by the petitioner has not been decided by the Authorities concerned, therefore, appropriate direction be issued to the Authorities to decide the same expeditiously as early as possible within a time frame.
[2025:RJ-JP:36515] (2 of 2) [CW-13621/2025]
3. Considering the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petition stands disposed of with directions to the Authorities concerned to decide the representation expeditiously as early as possible preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
4. With the aforesaid observation, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. All pending application(s), if any, also stand
disposed of.
5. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not issued any direction/order to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner in a particular way. The respondents would be at liberty to decide the same, strictly in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /41