[2025:RJ-JP:10217] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 158/2021 Madan Lal Sharma Son Of. Sh. Moolchand Sharma, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Ridamlas, Tehsil Ladnu District Nagaur. (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus Smt. Chitralekha W/o Madan Lal Sharma, D/o Shri Vinod Kumar Jakhodia, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Ridamlas, Tehsil Ladnu, District Nagaur, (Raj.) Presently Residing At Ward No. 13, Madeliya School Ke Peechhe, Pilani, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shamsul Aarefin For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sanjay Tyagi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 06/03/2025 1. Stay application no. 2012/2021 is dismissed as withdrawn. 2. Stay application stands disposed of. 3. Considered submissions of learned counsel for the parties. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that they have challenged the order dated 04.10.2021 in misc. case no. 27/2019 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is father of minor daughter born out of wedlock between present petitioner and respondent. Learned counsel submits that his limited prayer is only for visitation right, so as to meet minor daughter residing with non-applicant. [2025:RJ-JP:10217] (2 of 3) [CR-158/2021] 5. Learned counsel for respondent(s) agreed to proposal, subject to not causing any physical harm or impressing with emotional blackmailing. 6. Learned counsel for petitioner agreed to aforesaid condition and submitted that a weekly visitation right be granted to petitioner. 7. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, and also considering the grounds as mentioned in revision petition, the revision petition is disposed of with consent of the parties in following manner: “(i) The respondent (wife) is directed to accompany minor daughter of petitioner and respondent to the public park named as “Panchvati” on every sunday between 8:00 am to 9:30 am, so that petitioner may meet his minor daughter. (ii) During this time, the petitioner can meet his minor daughter in presence of respondent in public park, but he will not insist for meeting at any other place. (iii) The petitioner (husband) will not cause any physical harm to minor daughter in any manner. (iv) The petitioner in no manner try to influence minor daughter by playing emotional tactics. (v) In case of persistent heat wave during summer and heavy rains on Sunday during [2025:RJ-JP:10217] (3 of 3) [CR-158/2021] rainy season, it is not necessary for the respondent to accompany minor daughter to Panchvati park and on such day the rule of exemption will be applicable but on coming Sunday all endeavours will be made by respondent to ensure for compliance of this order. (vi) Till the main petition no. 27/2019 under Section 25 of Indian Guardian and Wards Act read with Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of CPC is decided by learned Additional District Judge, Chirawa, this order will remain in force.” 8. With aforesaid, the revision petition and misc. application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /88