- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:4373 RFA No. 1564 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1564 OF 2023 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. P.W.SEETHAMMA, (DECEASED), REPRESENTED BY HER DAUGHTER, HARINI NANDAKUMAR, HARINI NANDAKUMAR, D/O LATE P.K.WOOTHAIAH, W/O DR.NANDAKUMAR.D.T., AGED ABOUT 62 YERAS, RESIDING AT DOOR NO.1030, 7TH MAIN, III STAGE, GOKULAM, MYSORE-570 002. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. HARISH.M.G., & SRI. VACHAN.G.A., ADVOCATES [ABSENT]) AND: 1. SMT. C.A.SARASWATHI AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, WIFE OF LATE P.W.SURESH, 2. KUM. KOUSTHUBHA.S AGED MAJOR, 3. KOWSHIK MUTHANNA AGED MAJOR, ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.4638, 15TH MAIN, 1ST CROSS, VIJAYANAGARA III STAGE, MYSORE-570 017. …RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:4373 RFA No. 1564 of 2023 THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH ORDER 41, RULE 1 OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the appellants are not represented. When the case is listed and is called out, the advocate must be present. His absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed before the Registrar (P & H) and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Again the appeal was listed before the Court and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Once again the appeal was listed on 09.01.2025, on that day, finally a week's time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the office was directed to list the appeal under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections’ on 30.01.2025. The appeal is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections’. Despite granting sufficient time, the appellants have not complied with - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:4373 RFA No. 1564 of 2023 the office objections. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. In view of peremptory order dated 09.01.2025, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution and also for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7