Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2928 (AP)

SMT.V.VEERALAKSHMI v. SMT.VADAPARTHI LAKSHMI & 5 ORS

FCA/66/2008 · 2025-07-01

Ninala Jayasurya, Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010009332008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3526] WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 66/2008 Between: 1. SMT.V.VEERALAKSHMI, W/O.LATE V.NOOKARAJU, HINDU, FEMALE R/O.GOURI GRANDHALAYAM, GAVARA KANCHARAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...APPELLANT AND 1. SMT VADAPARTHI LAKSHMI 5 ORS, W/O.LATE V.NOOKARAJU, HINDU, FEMALE R/O.D.NO.49-11-18, LALITA NAGAR, NEHRU BAZAR, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. SRRI VADAPARTHI SRINIVAS, S/O.LATE V.NOOKARAJU, HINDU, MALE R/O.D.NO.49-11-18, LALITA NAGAR, NEHRU BAZAR, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. SMT NALLAMAVIDI SATYAVENI, W/O.LATE N.SREENU, HINDU, FEMALE R/O.MURARI VIL, GANDEPALLI, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. SMT KANJURUPU VILAYALAKSHMI, W/O.LATE K.SREENU, HINDU, FEMALE R/O.MURARI VIL, GANDEPALLI, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. THE SPECIAL DY COLLECTOR LA, SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE, VISAKHAPATNAM 6. THE STATE REP BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal under section against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2008(FCAMP 165 OF 2008 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased dispense with filing of CC of decree & judgement in OP No.700 of 2004 passed by the Family Court, Visakhapatnam dated 12.05.2008 for the present IA NO: 2 OF 2008(FCAMP 167 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents 5 and 6 not to pay the death benefits of late V.Nookaraju to respondents 1 to 4 herein pending disposal of the appeal IA NO: 3 OF 2008(FCAMP 227 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the interim order dated 28.05.2008 in FCAMP No.167 of 2008 in FCA No.66 of 2008 on thee file of the Hon'ble High Court in the interest of justice IA NO: 1 OF 2012(FCAMP 646 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners 1 to 4 herein to withdraw the half of the decretal amount in OP.No.700 of 2004, dt. 12/05/2008 on the file of the Judge, Family Court, at Visakhapatnam in the interest of justice Counsel for the Appellant: 1. SMT.V.VEERALAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KARRI SURYANARAYANA The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: Perused the docket proceedings dated 25.6.2025. No representation on behalf of the appellant. 3 Hence the F.C.A. is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Appeal, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 02.7.2025 RD 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 66/2008 Date: 02.7.2025 RD