- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18808 RFA No. 1778 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1778 OF 2016 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. (a) SMT. MUNIRATHNAMMA @ RATHNAMMA W/O. LATE. H. NANJUNDA REDDY, SINCE DEAD BY HER LR'S, SRI. VIJAYA RAGHAVA REDDY S/O. LATE. SMT. MUNIRATHNAMMA, AGE ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT NO. 28, 6TH CROSS, OPPOSITE M.S. VILLA APARTMENTS, KULLAPPA COLONY, MURUGESHPALYA, BANGALORE-560 017. 2. SMT. RUKMINI D/O. LATE. SMT. MUNIRATHNAMMA, W/O. RAMACHANDRA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT NO. 3, KPTCL QUARTERS, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-560 034. 3. SRI. VENUGOPAL REDDY D/O. LATE. SMT. MUNIRATHNAMMA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT NO. 337, DODDATHOGUR VILLAGE, BENGALURU-560 081. 4. SMT. K.H.SAROJAMMA W/O. LATE. K.P.BALAKRISHNAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/AT KUNDALAHALLI, DODDENAKUNDI POST, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18808 RFA No. 1778 of 2016 BANGALORE-560 081. 5. SRI. RAMA REDDY S/O. LATE. SMT.NARAYANAMMA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT NO. 17, LALBHAGH, SIDDAPURA, JAYANAGAR 1ST BLOCK, BANGALORE-11. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. B.N.SURESH., ADVOCATE FOR A1 (A, B, C) & A2 [ABSENT]; SRI. SHIVAMURTHI.A.R., ADVOCATE FOR A3 [ABSENT]) AND: 1. KUSHALA RAMA REDDY @ RAMA REDDY S/O. LATE. K.R.HANUMANTHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT NANJA REDDY COLONY, HANUMANTHAREDDY LANE, MURUGESHA PALYA, HAL POST, BANGALORE-17. 2. SMT. SUSHEELAMMA W/O. H. CHENNA REDDY, D/O. LATE. K.R.HANUMANTHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT NANJA REDDY COLONY, HANUMANTHAREDDY LANE, MURUGESHA PALYA, HAL POST, BANGALORE-17. 3. SMT. MEENAKSHAMMA D/O. LATE. K.R.HANUMANTHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, NO. 17, LALBHAGH SIDDAPURA, JAYANAGAR 1ST BLOCK, BANGALORE-560 011. 4. SMT. SHARADAMMA W/O. LATE. K.R.HANUMANTHA REDDY, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18808 RFA No. 1778 of 2016 AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R.AT NO. 89/1, VINAYAKA NAGAR, BEHIND KSRTC COLONY, AUDUGODI POST, BANGALORE-30. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. NAGAREDDY.V., ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED AS UNDER: ORAL JUDGMENT When the case is called, the appellants are not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 03.06.2025, on that day, when the matter is called, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants, either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the appellants it was ordered to be listed on 04.06.2025. The appeal is listed today for appearance of counsel of the appellants. As already noted above, when the case is - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18808 RFA No. 1778 of 2016 called, the appellants are not represented. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21