[2025:RJ-JP:35712] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11215/2025 Dhanraj Meena S/o Birdhi Lal Meena, R/o Village Kundala, Police Station Seeswali, District Baran (Raj.) (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Baran) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amitabh Vijaywargia Mr. Amit Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 04/09/2025 1. Instant application for bail is filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicant-accused Dhanraj Meena S/o Birdhi Lal Meena in FIR No. 196/2024 dated 10.09.2024 registered at P.S. Central Police Station District -Jaipur ACB, whereby the applicant-accused was charged under Sections 7A of PC (Amended) Act, 2018. 2. The applicant was arrested and is in judicial custody since his arrest. The Court below has dismissed the bail application. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicant is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. He further submitted that charge-sheet has been filed. He also submits that the trial will take its own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the applicant-accused in custody. [2025:RJ-JP:35712] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11215/2025] 4. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that complainant Trilok Chand has registered a complaint for demand of bribe against a Labour Inspector and not want to give money to Labour Inspector or his middleman (present petitioner). He further submitted that petitioner is running a e-mitra Kiosk and for filling application form of daughter of complainant, the petitioner has charged his fee. He further submitted that initially he took ₹1 but later ₹999/-. He also submitted that present petitioner is a private person and a charge-sheet has been filed under Section 7A of Prevention of Corruption (Amended) Act, 2018 is filed against petitioner but without arraying Labour Inspector, as an accused, who is public servant. 5. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. He submitted a report received from Dy. SP, ACB Bundi and same is taken on record. 6. Heard learned counsel for the applicant-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record. 7. On the basis of complaint lodged by Trilok, verification was conducted and afterwards a trap is organized and present petitioner is arrested. Now charge-sheet has been filed against petitioner. 8. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, [2025:RJ-JP:35712] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11215/2025] the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant- accused. 9. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Dhanraj Meena S/o Birdhi Lal Meena, is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 10. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /185