IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 222 MONU KUMAR STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: Present: MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) 1. 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 04.02.2025, under Sections 351(2) of BNS, 2023, registered at Police Station (Annexure P- 2. anticipatory bail with direction to join investigation and the relevant part of the said order reads as under: petitioner has no previous criminal IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM- Date of decision: May 22 MONU KUMAR Versus HARYANA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Mr. Sanyam Khetarpal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Yuvraj Shandilya, AAG, Haryana. MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS, for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. .2025, under Sections 115(2), 127(2), 140(3), 190, 191(2), 308(2), of BNS, 2023, registered at Police Station -1). On 25.02.2025, the petitioner had been granted interim anticipatory bail with direction to join investigation and the relevant part of the said order reads as under: - “Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that the petitioner has no previous criminal version and cross- version wherein neither of the parties received injuries at the hands of each other. Furthermore, it has been asserted that the only role attributed to the petitioner is of being part of unlawful asserably wh complainant party.” IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -M-10832-2025 Date of decision: May 22, 2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondent HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL , Advocate Yuvraj Shandilya, AAG, Haryana. The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS, for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.27 dated 115(2), 127(2), 140(3), 190, 191(2), 308(2), of BNS, 2023, registered at Police Station Saran, District Faridabad the petitioner had been granted interim anticipatory bail with direction to join investigation and the relevant part of Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that the petitioner has no previous criminal antecedents; it is a case of version wherein neither of the parties received injuries at the hands of each other. Furthermore, it has been asserted that the only role attributed to the petitioner is of being part of unlawful asserably which attacked the ...Petitioner ...Respondent The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS, dated 115(2), 127(2), 140(3), 190, 191(2), 308(2), Faridabad the petitioner had been granted interim anticipatory bail with direction to join investigation and the relevant part of Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that the antecedents; it is a case of version wherein neither of the parties received injuries at the hands of each other. Furthermore, it has been asserted that the only role attributed to the petitioner is of attacked the Jaspreet Kaur 2025.05.22 18:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-10832 3. compliance of order dated and cooperated with the investigating agency. 4. factum of the petitioner having joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. He, on further instructions, submits that the petitioner is not required for further inves interrogation. 5. dated 25.02.2025, is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C./482(2) BNSS. May 22, 2025 Jaspreet Kaur 10832-2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has reiterated that in compliance of order dated 25.02.2025, the petitioner has joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. Learned State counsel, on instructions, does not dispute the factum of the petitioner having joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. He, on further instructions, submits that the petitioner is not required for further investigation, much less for his custodial interrogation. In view of the above, the petition is allowed, and interim order .02.2025, is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C./482(2) BNSS. May 22, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable -2- Learned counsel for the petitioner has reiterated that in .02.2025, the petitioner has joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. Learned State counsel, on instructions, does not dispute the factum of the petitioner having joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. He, on further instructions, submits that the petitioner tigation, much less for his custodial In view of the above, the petition is allowed, and interim order .02.2025, is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No Learned counsel for the petitioner has reiterated that in .02.2025, the petitioner has joined investigation Learned State counsel, on instructions, does not dispute the factum of the petitioner having joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. He, on further instructions, submits that the petitioner tigation, much less for his custodial In view of the above, the petition is allowed, and interim order .02.2025, is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Jaspreet Kaur 2025.05.22 18:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh