MASIH CHARAN PURTI ALIAS MASIH CHARAN MUNDA ALIAS MASIH CHARAN SANDI PURTI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
W.P.(Cr.)/63/2025 · 2025-01-22
Navneet Kumar, Sujit Narayan Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29272 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29272 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(Cr.) (DB) No. 63 of 2025
----- Masih Charan Purti @ Masih Charan Munda @ Masih Charan Sandi Purti, aged about 49 years S/o late Joseph Munda @ Joseph Birsa Sandi Purti, R/o Village-Itti tola, Sirjan PO & PS- Bandgaon, District-Chaibasa West Singhbhum … … Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Jharkhand at Project Building Dhurwa, PO & PS- Dhurwa, District-Ranchi
2. The Director General of Police, Headquarter Dhurwa, PO & PS- Dhurwa, District-Ranchi
3. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-District Magistrate at Khunti, PO & PS-Khunti, District-Khunti
4. The Superintendent of Police at Khunti, PO & PS-Khunti, District- Khunti
5. The Sub-division Police Officer at Khunti, PO & PS-Khunti, District- Khunti
6. The Officer-in-Charge at Police Station Khunti, PO & PS-Khunti, District-Khunti
… … Respondents -------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVNEET KUMAR
------- For the Petitioner : Mr. S.K. Vishwakarma, Advocate
Mr. Abhay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Devesh Krishna, SC(Mines)-III ------
Order No.2/Dated: 22nd January, 2025
Mr. S.K. Vishwakarma, the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner at the outset after going through the order impugned appended as Annexure-4 has submitted that the detention order dated 23.10.2024 was being operative for three months and the said period is over now, as such, he does not want to press the present writ petition, since, according to him, it has become infructuous.
2. Such submission has been made in presence of Mr. Devesh Krishna, the learned State counsel who after going through the impugned
order appended as Annexxure-4 by which the detention order has been passed against the petitioner which was operative for a period of three
2
months has submitted that the detention period of three months having been lapsed and as such nothing survives to be decided in the present writ petition.
3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed having been infructuous and disposed of, as such.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
Sudhir
(Navneet Kumar, J.)