Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29266 (JHR)

AMARESH KUMAR SINGH v. DEOGHAR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THROUGH MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER

WPC/6558/2018 · 2025-08-20

Rajesh Shankar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2019:JHHC:26092 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 6558 of 2018 Amaresh Kumar Singh, aged about 46 years, son of Narendra Mohan Singh, Resident of Sarkar Bhawan, William Town, P.O.+P.S. and District Deoghar. ... ... Petitioner Versus 1. Deoghar Municipal Corporation, through Municipal Commissioner, having its Office at Dumka, P.O., P.S. and District Deoghar. 2. Municipal Commissioner, Deoghar Municipal Corporation, having its Office at Dumka, P.O., P.S. and District Deoghar. 3. Chief Executive Officer, Deoghar Municipal Corporation, having its Office at Dumka, P.O., P.S. and District Deoghar. 4. M/s Anand Construction, through its partner Santosh Kumar Singh, S/o - not known to the Petitioner, having its Office at Tabaghat, P.O. and P.S. Jasidih, District Deoghar. ... Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Prashant Pallav, Advocate. Mr. Ayush, A.C. to Mr. Prashant Pallav. For the DMC : Mr. Vijay Shanker Jha, Advocate Ms. Adwita Arya, Advocate. For Resp. No. 4 : Mr. Ravi Prakash Mishra, Advocate. --------- 04/Dated: 20.08.2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner states that since this petition was filed way back in 2018 questioning the allotment of work made in favour of the private respondent and no interim order was granted by this Court, the same has been rendered infructuous as the work by now would have been completed and moreover, the duration of the tender has, otherwise come to an end. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan, C.J.) (Rajesh Shankar, J.) N.A.F.R. APK/VK