Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29264 (RAJ)

SUNITA POONIA D/O SHRI SHANTI LAL POONIA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/13542/2025 · 2025-09-10

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:36521] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13542/2025 1. Sunita Poonia D/o Shri Shanti Lal Poonia, Aged About 44 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 114A, Balaji Vihar 25, Bainad Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Prakash Singh Rawat S/o Mansa Ram Rawat, Aged About 54 Years, Resident Of Siwai Chak Bhumi, Talab Wali Basti, Madarpura, Maday Bhinay, Ajmer, Rajasthan. 3. Roopa Ram Jat S/o Shri Bhagu Ram Jat, Aged About 48 Years, Resident Of Village - Bhooni, Nagaur, District - Nagaur, Rajasthan. 4. Chanda Sheshma W/o Ranjeet Singh Dhayal, Aged About 37 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 12, Balyawas, District - Sikar, Rajasthan. 5. Padma Ram Jangu S/o Shri Raju Ram Jangu, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Village - Shivpura, Raidhanu, District - Nagaur, Rajasthan. 6. Rajveer Singh S/o Shri Bhom Singh, Aged About 43 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 11, Raidhana, District - Nagour, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Jaipur. 3. The Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Kishangarh Rainwal, District Jaipur. 4. The Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Jobner, District Jaipur. 5. The Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Jalsu, District Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manoj Ojla with Mr. Ashish Tuhania For Respondent(s) : [2025:RJ-JP:36521] (2 of 3) [CW-13542/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Order 10/09/2025 Although, in the writ petition, a direction is sought to the respondents to extend the petitioners notional and other service benefits from the date similarly situated persons have been extended these benefits under the LDC recruitment, 2013; but, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that they would feel contented if they are granted a liberty to submit representation(s) with the respondents for redressal of their grievance(s) who may be directed to decide the same expeditiously taking into consideration the order/judgment of this Court dated 18.07.2018 passed in the case of Nand Kishore Sharma and Others vs. State of Rajasthan and Others: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12109/2018. In view of the nature of prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and an order of this Court dated 02.02.2024 passed in the case of Pawan Meena versus The State of Rajasthan & Ors.: SB Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024, this writ petition is disposed of in following terms without issuing notice to the respondents: (1) The petitioners are at liberty to file representation(s) with the respondents for redressal of their grievance(s) within a period of four weeks from today. (2) The respondents shall pass a reasoned and speaking order thereon within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt taking into consideration the order/judgment of this Court dated 18.07.2018 passed in the case of Nand [2025:RJ-JP:36521] (3 of 3) [CW-13542/2025] Kishore Sharma (supra) with communication of the decision to them. (3) If the petitioners are found eligible and entitled for grant of notional and other service benefits as paid to the similarly situated employees, the compliance shall be made within a period of 8 weeks from the date of taking the decision. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J DIKSHA /70