IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Sandeep State of Haryana and others CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Sukhdev Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional A.G., Haryana and Mr. Saurabh Mago, DEEPAK SIBAL Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Deputy Commissioner, Panipat, District Panipat decision on the the petitioner. 2. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. 3. Accordingly, at thi case, the writ petition is disposed of wit decision on the the petitioner, by passing a speaking order hearing to all concerned, preferably within two a copy of this order. 4. Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioner and if the decision is not to the be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. July 29, 2025 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : Sr. No.115 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-5462-2025 Date of Decision : Versus State of Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Sukhdev Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional A.G., Haryana and Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Deputy Commissioner, Panipat, District Panipat decision on the application dated 11.02.2025 (Annexure P Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 decision on the application dated 11.02.2025 (Annexure P the petitioner, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of concerned, preferably within two month a copy of this order. Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioner and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, he would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. (DEEPAK SIBAL JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 29.07.2025 …Petitioner …Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional A.G., Haryana and Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Deputy Commissioner, Panipat, District Panipat-respondent No.2 to take a 2025 (Annexure P-2), made on behalf of Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no s stage, without commenting on the merits of the h a direction to respondent No.2 to take a .2025 (Annexure P-2), made on behalf of and after affording opportunity of months from the date of receipt of Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the satisfaction of the petitioner, he would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2025.08.05 14:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document