Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2926 (BOM)

MS CHARULATA SURYKANT VEDAK AND ORS v. MRS. MEGHANA NISHIT MURDESHWAR

IA/38403/2025 · 2026-02-12

Gauri Godse

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

29-RPAST-37048-2025.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION 38403 OF 2025 IN REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO. 37048 OF 2025 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER No. 5 OF 2025 Ms. Charulata Surykant Vedak … Applicant/Petitioner and Others Vs. Mrs. Meghana Nishit Murdeshwar … Respondent Mr. Ashish Dubey a/w. Ms. Yogita Kanojiya for the Applicants/Petitioners. CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATE : 12th FEBRUARY 2026 ORDER : 1. This application is for condonation of delay in filing review petition. The review petition is filed by the appellants i.e. original defendant nos. 1 to 3 seeking review of order dated 7th February 2025 dismissing the appeal from order. The appeal was filed to challenge the order granting interim injunction restraining the defendants from creating third party rights in respect of the suit property. The grounds argued in the review petition are in the nature of the grounds of 1/2 rrpillai RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Digitally signed by RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Date: 2026.02.13 18:13:33 +0530 29-RPAST-37048-2025.docx challenge in the appeal to challenge the order under review. The said grounds cannot be entertained in the review petition. 2. In the facts and circumstances of the case, delay is condoned and the interim application is allowed. 3. For the reasons recorded above, review petition is rejected. [GAURI GODSE, J.] 2/2