JAGDISH MEENA S/O SH. NARAYAN MEENA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/13769/2025 · 2025-09-18
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29259 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29259 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:38165] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13769/2025 Jagdish Meena S/o Sh. Narayan Meena, Aged About 67 Years, R/o Patiya Ki Dhani, Laxmipura, Bilwa Kalan, Bilwa, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its P.p
2. The District Excise Officer, Jaipur (City), Vitt Bhawan, Janpath, Jaipur.
3. The Commissioner Of Police, Police Commissionerate, M.i. Road, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy Commissioner Of Police, (Jaipur South) Office Of Police Commissioner, Jaipur.
5. The S.h.o. Police Station, Shivdaspura, Jaipur South.
6. Manoj Kumar Sansi S/o Sh. Unknown, R/o Plot No. 46, Parshwanath Colony, Block D-, Near Parshwanath College Village Bas Bilwa, Tehsil Sanganer District Jaipur.
7. Smt. Machhla W/o Manoj Kumar Sansi, R/o Plot No. 46, Parshwanath Colony, Block D-, Near Parshwanath College Village Bas Bilwa, Tehsil Sanganer District Jaipur.
8. Sheetal D/o Manoj Kumar Sansi, R/o Plot No. 46, Parshwanath Colony, Block D-, Near Parshwanath College Village Bas Bilwa, Tehsil Sanganer District Jaipur.
9. Vishal Sansi S/o Manoj Kumar Sansi, R/o Plot No. 46, Parshwanath Colony, Block D-, Near Parshwanath College Village Bas Bilwa, Tehsil Sanganer District Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Junaid Khan for Mr. Asgar Khan For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 18/09/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:38165] (2 of 2) [CW-13769/2025]
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is a resident of locality wherein illegal sale of liquor is functioning, moreover, without any authorized licenses. It is further submitted that the State/respondents are giving deaf ear to the representation filed by the petitioner.
2. It is further submitted that due to the said action of respondents the fundamental rights of the petitioner as enshrined under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India are being violated, moreover, the DPSP as provided under Article 47 of the Constitution of India is also being ignored by the respondent- State.
3. This Court deems it fit to direct respondent Nos.2 and 3 to decide the representation dated 16.07.2025 within a period of 30 days, strictly in accordance with law, as per the ratio encapsulated in light of Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No. 1665/2024) and Circular issued by the Chief Secretary for the State of Rajasthan, dated 19.02.2024 (No. i- 10¼1½ izlq-@vuqq-&1@2012).
4. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/7