APHC010418202012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL Between: The Special Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition, S.R.B.C., Nandyal, Kurnool District. AND Chennaiah, S/o.Pedda Kambanna, Aged 49 years, Cherlopalli Village, Owk Mandal, Kurnool District. Counsel for the Appellant Counsel for the Respondent The Court made the following At the time of considering the matter, it is counsel on both sides that in the connected batch of appeal L.A.A.S. No.167 of 2011 and batch, this Court reviewed the Common Judgment dated 28.4.2016 and dismissed the appeal Order dated 18.7.2025 confirming th made by the Reference Court in L.A.O.P.No.29 of 2007 and batch 26.2.2010. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT No.172 of 2012 The Special Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition, S.R.B.C., Nandyal, Kurnool District. … Appellant Chennaiah, S/o.Pedda Kambanna, Aged 49 years, Cherlopalli Village, Owk Mandal, Kurnool District. … Respondent Counsel for the Appellant : Mr.T.S.Rayalu, G.P. for Appeals Counsel for the Respondent : Mr.K.Rathanga Pani Reddy The Court made the following JUDGMENT: (per NJS,J) At the time of considering the matter, it is submitted by the learned counsel on both sides that in the connected batch of appeal L.A.A.S. No.167 of 2011 and batch, this Court reviewed the Common Judgment dated 28.4.2016 and dismissed the appeals vide Common confirming the enhancement of the compensation the Reference Court in L.A.O.P.No.29 of 2007 and batch [3526] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Appellant Respondent Mr.T.S.Rayalu, G.P. for Appeals Mr.K.Rathanga Pani Reddy submitted by the learned counsel on both sides that in the connected batch of appeals vide L.A.A.S. No.167 of 2011 and batch, this Court reviewed the Common vide Common e enhancement of the compensation the Reference Court in L.A.O.P.No.29 of 2007 and batch, dated 2 LAAS_172_2012 2. In view of the same and for the reasons alike, the present appeal is liable to be dismissed and the same is, accordingly, dismissed. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA,J ____________________________ TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO,J July 24, 2025 vasu