[2025:RJ-JP:36746] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. 2nd Bail Application No. 11288/2025 Gopal Lal S/o Jagannath, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Chainpura Dedwadi Tan Bilod, Police Station Raisar, District Jaipur Rural. (At Present The Petitioner Is Confined In District Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Kumar Sharma Mr. Dinesh Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asst. G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 10/09/2025 1. This second bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.212/2024 registered at Police Station Raisar, District Jaipur Rural for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 126(2), 115(2), 329(3), 351(2) and 352 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (in short, ‘BNS’), 2023. 2. The first bail application preferred on behalf of the petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn by this court vide order dated 31.07.2025 while giving liberty to renew the prayer for bail after filing of result of investigation. Now, charge-sheet has been filed, thus, this second bail application has been preferred. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is [2025:RJ-JP:36746] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11288/2025] contended that allegation of causing injury on the eye of injured is against co-accused namely- Rahul. It is submitted that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. It is argued that petitioner is in custody since 11.07.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 4. Learned State counsel opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. I have considered the contentions. 6. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also considering the fact that allegation of causing injury on the eye of injured is against co- accused namely- Rahul, there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow this second bail application. 7. This second bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Gopal Lal S/o Jagannath, shall be released on bail provided, he shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2025:RJ-JP:36746] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11288/2025] 8. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /106