JAKIR HUSSAIN ALIAS FITU SK v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./10362/2024 · 2025-01-31
Rajesh Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29238 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29238 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.10362 of 2024 ---- Jakir Hussain @ Fitu Sk., aged about 54 years, Son of Late Muddin Sk. @ Kalimuddin Sk., Resident of Village – Alipur, Kaliyachak, P.O. & P.S.- Kaliyachak, District – Malda, West Bengal (732201)
…. …. Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) Versus
The State of Jharkhand
…. …. Opposite Party ----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ----
For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Adv.
Ms. Pushpanjali Kumari, Adv.
For the State
: Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, A.P.P. ----
04/Dated: 31st January, 2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the State.
2. The applicant who is in custody since 01.05.2024 has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Barharwa P.S. Case No.160 of 2021 [G.R. No.495 of 2024] [S.T. Case No.221 of 2024], registered for the offence under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Rajmahal.
3. It appears that earlier the prayer for bail of the applicant had been rejected by this Court vide order dated 01.08.2024 in B.A. No.5735 of 2024.
4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant(s) that complete set of FIR along with its enclosure have been annexed with this bail application and there is no suppression on his/her part.
5. Innocence has been claimed by the learned counsel for the applicant and undertaking has been given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted that the main witness i.e. the wife of the deceased has been declared hostile. Further, no external injury has been found as it appears from the post-mortem report. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been made.
6.
Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.
7. Considering the above facts, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the applicant, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional
Page | 2
B.A. No.10362 of 2024
Sessions Judge-I, Rajmahal in connection with Barharwa P.S. Case No.160 of 2021 [G.R. No.495 of 2024], subject to condition that the applicant(s) will submit self-attested photocopy/photocopies of his/her/their Aadhaar Card(s) and also submit his/her/their mobile number(s) before the learned court below which he/she/they will always keep active and will not change it during pendency of this case without prior permission of the court.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.) Amar/- Uploaded