Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29235 (KAR)

SMT MUNIRA BEGUM v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CCC/712/2024 · 2025-04-03

K V Aravind, N V Anjaria Cj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:14239-DB CCC No. 712 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND CCC NO. 712 OF 2024 (CIVIL) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. MUNIRA BEGUM W/O. MOHAMMED AKRAM ULLA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT 154, 4TH C CROSS 100 FEET RING ROAD, ILYASNAGAR, J.P. NAGAR POST BENGALURU - 560 078 …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. N SRIRAM REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S. BUILDING AMEBEDKAR VIDHI VIDHAN SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560 001 REP BY ITS SECRETARY ...PROFORMA RESPONDENT Digitally signed by CHAITHRA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:14239-DB CCC No. 712 of 2024 2. MR. SRINIVAS THE TAHASILDAR BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT KANDAYA BHAVAN BENGALURU - 560 001 3. MR. SACHIN N.S., THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND REVENUE, BENGALURU SOUTH DIVISION KANDAYA BHAVAN BENGALURU - 560 001 …ACCUSED (BY SRI. NAVEEN CHANDRASHEKAR, AGA) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, R/W ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED PERSONS FOR DELIBERATE AND WILFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER DATED 01.04.2024 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT CCC NO.1110/2023 (CIVIL) AT ANNEXURE-B AND PUNISH THEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:14239-DB CCC No. 712 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA) Learned Additional Government Advocate Mr. Naveen Chandrashekar stated that mutation entry is already effected in favour of the complainant on 25.02.2025. The factum of mutation was not disputed by learned advocate Mr. N. Sriram Reddy for the complainant, who appeared through video conferencing. In the aforesaid view, nothing further survives in the present contempt petition. It is accordingly dismissed as not surviving. Sd/- (N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE CR/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 114