Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29233 (AP)

IDHAM ADS AND SERVICES v. ANIL KUMAR SINGHAL

CC/3761/2024 · 2025-02-19

B Krishna Mohan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010418992024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: Between: Idham Ads And Services Anil Kumar Singhal and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M/S INDUS LAW FIRM Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3761/2024 AND Anil Kumar Singhal and Others ...CONTEMNOR(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: M/S INDUS LAW FIRM Counsel for the Contemnor(S): IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3233] WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN ...PETITIONER ...CONTEMNOR(S) 2 HBKM,J C.C.No.3761 of 2024 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. This Contempt Case arises against the non-implementation of the interim order passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.20705 of 2024, dated 20.09.2024. However, since the main writ petition was already disposed of, no cause of action survives in this contempt case. 3. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 19.02.2025 MDP