CHANDRAJEET SINGH @ CHANDU S/O SHRI GHISA SINGH RAWAT v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLW/1184/2025 · 2025-09-15
Avneesh Jhingan, Baljinder Singh Sandhu
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29232 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29232 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:37391-DB] 0HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) No. 1184/2025 Chandrajeet Singh @ Chandu S/o Shri Ghisa Singh Rawat, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Thoriya, P.S. Devgarh, District Rajasmand (Raj.) (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Udaipur) Through His Mother - Radha Devi W/o Shri Ghisa Singh Rawat, Aged About 70 Years, R/o Thoriya, P.S. Devgarh, District Rajasmand (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, through Home Secretary, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
2. The District Parole Advisory Committee, Through Its Chairman, District Magistrate, Rajsamand (Raj.)
3. The Superintendent, Central Jail, Udaipur (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Tekchand Swami For Respondent(s) : Mr.Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, Dy. Govt. Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU
Order 15/09/2025
1. Matter comes up on misc. application for early hearing of the writ petition.
2.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that on 12.09.2025 early hearing application has already been allowed by this Court, yet wrongly listed.
3. Office to proceed and remain careful in future.
[2025:RJ-JP:37391-DB] (2 of 2) [CRLW-1184/2025]
4. This petition is filed challenging the order dated 12.08.2025, whereby the Superintendent Central Jail, Udaipur imposed a condition of furnishing of two surety bonds of Rs.50,000/- each of the near relatives.
5. The grievance raised in the present petition was that division bench of this Court vide order dated 07.08.2025 allowed the parole subject to furnishing of personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surities of like amount to the satisfaction of the Superintendent Central Jail, Udaipur.
6.
Learned counsel for the respondent on specific instructions submits that the impugned order is being withdrawn and parole of the petitioner shall be proceeded in accordance with law in compliance of the order dated 07.08.2025.
7. The criminal writ petition (parole) is disposed of.
(BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Monika/61