Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29228 (RAJ)

RAVI KUMAR S/O SHIBBHURAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/11212/2025 · 2025-09-03

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:35171] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11212/2025 Ravi Kumar S/o Shibbhuram, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Nathwa Ka Pura Katkar, Tehsil And P.s. Hindaun City, District Karauli. (Presently Confined At District Jail Sawai Madhopur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Babu Lal Yogi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 03/09/2025 1. Instant application for bail is filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicant-accused Ravi Kumar S/o Shibbhuram in FIR No. 73/2025 dated 30.03.2025 registered at P.S. Kundera, District -Sawai Madhopur, whereby the applicant-accused was charged under Section 303 (2) of BNS and Section 4/21 of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act. 2. The applicant was arrested and is in judicial custody since his arrest. The Court below has dismissed the bail application. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicant is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. Further, he submits that the investigation relating to present applicant-accused is complete and is no more required by the Investigating Agency for investigation, as charge-sheet has been filed. He further assures that in case, [2025:RJ-JP:35171] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11212/2025] the applicant-accused is required the applicant-accused will be available. He also submits that the trial will take its own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the applicant-accused in custody. 4. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. 5. Heard learned counsel for the applicant-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record. 6. On basis of interception on 30.03.2025 of tractor and trolley by Suresh Chand (ASI, P.S. Kundera), the matter was intercepted and after investigation, a charge-sheet has been filed. The impugned order dated 05.04.2025 indicate that a penalty of ₹1.29 lacs has been deposited and disposal of case will take time. 7. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant-accused. 8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Ravi Kumar S/o Shibbhuram, is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused Ravi Kumar S/o Shibbhuram, is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. [2025:RJ-JP:35171] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11212/2025] (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /27