PAWAN KUMAR SHARMA S/O SHRI SHANKARLAL SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/11144/2025 · 2025-09-01
Praveer Bhatnagar
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29222 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29222 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:35098] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11144/2025 Pawan Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Shankarlal Sharma, Aged About 45 Years, R/o 1/24, Rathi Nagar, Naurangabad, Tehsil Kol, Police Station Gandhipark, District Alwar (U.p.) (At Present Petitioner Is Confined In Central Jail Bharatpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. G.L. Sharma, Mr. Shankar Lal, Ms. Anju Rani Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 01/09/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 598/2023 registered at Police Station Mathuragate, District Bharatpur for the offences under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of IPC.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the main allegation of forging the will is against co-accused Pinki and not against the present petitioner. It is alleged against the petitioner that he provided stamp to the main accused Pinki. The civil suit is also pending between co- accused Pinki and the complainant and in the present FIR, co- accused Pinki has obtained no coercive action from the co-ordinate Bench of this Court. The offences alleged against the accused-
[2025:RJ-JP:35098] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-11144/2025] petitioner are exclusively triable by Magistrate. The accused- petitioner is in custody since 17.08.2025 and the trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
4. Heard and perused the material available on record.
5. Considering the fact that the offences alleged against the accused-petitioner are exclusively triable by Magistrate. The main allegation of forging the will is against co-accused Pinki. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 17.08.2025 and the trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Pawan Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Shankarlal Sharma, in connection with FIR No. 598/2023 registered at Police Station Mathuragate, District Bharatpur, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/254