YATIN YADAV TH NIDHI v. U T OF J AND K TH INVESTIGATING OFFICER CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION JAMMU
CRM(M)/303/2023 · 2025-02-21
Rajnesh Oswal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2922 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2922 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Crm(M) No. 303/2023 CrlM No. 558/2023
Yatin Yadav
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
vs
U.T. of J&K. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Monika Kohli, Advocate
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER 21.02.2025
1. There had been no representation on behalf of the petitioner for the last two dates of hearing. Same is the position today also. It seems that the petitioner has lost the interest in prosecuting the instant petition. As such, the instant petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
Jammu: 21.02.2025 Suraj
59 Rakesh Kumar 2025.02.27 13:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document