2025:CGHC:29243 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6076 of 2025 Chandan Kumar Ray S/o Sunil Ray Aged About 28 Years R/o Sirsay Dhanwar, Village Domaydih P.O. - Barotand, P.S. Dhanwar, District Giridih, (Jharkhand) - 825412. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The Union Of India Through Secretary, Ministry Of Home Affairs, New Delhi. 2 - Director General Crpf, Cgo Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi. 3 - Inspector General Chhatisgarh Sector, Crpf, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Deputy Inspector General Range Crpf, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Deputy Inspector General Group Centre, Crpf, Raipur Chhattisgarh. 6 - Commandant 65 Bn. Crpf, Tulsi Baradera, Chandkhri Road, Raipur Chhattisgarh 492101. ...Respondents (Cause title is taken from the CIS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Shri Nitin Agrawal, Advocate through virtual mode For Respondent/Union of India : Shri Ramakant Mishra, DSGI along with Shri Neeraj Baghel, Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 30.06.2025 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents/Union of India would submit that the impugned termination order dated 04.06.2025 (Annexure P1), passed by respondent-6 has been withdrawn by the Department vide order dated 21.06.2025. In support of his submission, learned counsel submits copy of withdrawal of termination order dated 21.06.2025, which has been taken on record. Digitally signed by V PADMAVATHI Date: 2025.07.02 10:55:41 +0530 Wps 6076 of 2025 2 2. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the respondents, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that since the order of termination itself is withdrawn, grievance of the petitioner has been redressed, and now, petitioner does not want to press the present petition. 3. On due consideration of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, present petition stands disposed of as not pressed. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to repeat his prayer, if cause of action arises. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE padma