SHAHID QAYOOM v. STATE TH. SECY. YOUTH SERVICES AND SPORTS DEPTT. AND ORS.
SWP/488/2019 · 2025-02-10
Rajnesh Oswal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2921 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2921 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No.94
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SWP No. 488/2019
Shahid Qayoom
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None Q
vs
State of J&K and others
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: None
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER 10.02.2025
1. Vide order dated 09.08.2023, the petitioner was directed to take steps for effecting service upon the respondent No. 7 within ten days. Report of the Registry reveals that the needful has not been done by the petitioner. Besides, the petitioner did not choose to appear on the previous date of hearing as well.
2. In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed for non- prosecution.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
Jammu 10.02.2025 Karam Chand/Secy.
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No
Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No.
KARAM CHAND 2025.02.11 13:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document