SHRILAL SON OF SHRI DHANNA v. CHOUTHILAL SON OF SHRI KISHANLAL
CW/13792/2025 · 2025-09-16
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29194 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29194 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:37684] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13792/2025
1. Shrilal Son Of Shri Dhanna, Resident Of Chahara (Chuli) Tehsil Gangapur City.
2. Kailash Son Of Shri Dhanna, Resident Of Chahara (Chuli) Tehsil Gangapur City.
3. Munshi Son Of Shri Dhanna, Resident Of Chahara (Chuli) Tehsil Gangapur City.
4. Phuloo Widow Of Shri Dhanna, Resident Of Chahara (Chuli) Tehsil Gangapur City.
5. Lallu Son Of Sukhlal, Resident Of Chahara (Chuli) Tehsil Gangapur City. ----Petitioners Versus
1. Chouthilal Son Of Shri Kishanlal, Resident Of Kolipada, Gangapur City.
2. Land Holder Tehsildar, Gangapur City.
3. Sub-Registrar, Through Tehsildar Gangapur City
4. Khemchand Son Of Shri Jairam, Resident Of Village, Bardkala, Tehsil Gangapur City.
5. Lakhanlal Son Of Kishor, Resident Of Gurjar Baroda, Tehsil And District Gangapur City ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rakesh Swami JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 16/09/2025
1. A limited prayer has been made by the counsel for the petitioners for issuing directions to the Revenue Appellate Authority, Sawai Madhopur (for short “RAA”) to decide the pending
[2025:RJ-JP:37684] (2 of 2) [CW-13792/2025] Appeal No.59/2024, expeditiously as early as possible, preferably within a time frame.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that being aggrieved by the judgment dated 30.07.2024 passed by court of Deputy Collector, the petitioners have preferred an appeal before the Court of RAA on 22.08.2024, so appropriate directions be issued to the Appellate Authority to decide the said appeal expeditiously.
3. Considering the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petition stands disposed of with the expectation from the Appellate Authority to make all possible endeavours to decide the pending appeal, expeditiously as early as possible, after providing due opportunity of hearing to all the respective parties.
4. In case, any stay application is preferred by the petitioners, it is expected from the Appellate Authority to pass necessary orders on the same after hearing arguments of both sides.
5. Stay application as well as all applications (pending, if any) also stand disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/35