Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29189 (PNJ)

MUKHTIAR SINGH v. SUMAN KUMAR WALIA AND OTHERS

CRM-A/429/2025 · 2025-08-21

Deepak Gupta, Mahabir Singh Sindhu

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-A-429-2025(O&M) 213 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-A-429-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 21.08.2025 Mukhtiar Singh ...Appellant Versus Suman Kumar Walia and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: Mr.K.S. Dhillon, Advocate for the applicant. ***** MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU, J. Present application seeking leave to appeal has been preferred for setting aside the impugned judgment dated 25.11.2024 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ludhiana and complaint filed by complainant be allowed and respondent Nos. 1 to 5 may be convicted and sentenced as per law. 2. At the outset, in view of judgment of Hon’ble the Supreme Court in case titled as “Celestium Financial Vs. A. Gnanasekaran and Others” reported in 2025 INSC 804, learned counsel, on instructions, wishes to withdraw the present application with liberty to take recourse to the remedy before learned Sessions Court in accordance with law. 3. Ordered accordingly. -1- HARISH KUMAR 2025.08.22 15:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-A-429-2025(O&M) 4. Needless to say that time consumed before this Court while pursuing CRM-A-429-2025 shall be considered in terms of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 while condoning the delay before learned Sessions Court. Pending application(s), including application of condonation of delay, shall also stand disposed off. (MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU) JUDGE (DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE 21.08.2025 Harish Kumar Whether speaking / reasoned : Yes No Whether Reportable : Yes No -2- HARISH KUMAR 2025.08.22 15:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document