2025:CGHC:16566 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S) No. 645 of 2016 Arun Kumar Pradhan, S/o S. R. Pradhan, aged about 52 Years, R/o H I G 65, Sagar Deep Enclave, Ameri, Uslapur P. S. Civil Lines, Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Chhattisgarh Through The Principal Secretary, Law And Legislative Affairs Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2. The High Court Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Registrar General, High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh --- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Abhishek Pandey, Advocate apepared on behalf of Shri Durgesh Goyal, Advocate. For Respondent No.1 : Shri Ankur Kashyap, Dy. Government Advocate. For Respondent No.2 : Shri Shashank Thakur, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput Order on Board 08/04/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking for the following relief : 10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may be kind enough in issuing a writ in the nature of certiorari, mandamus or any other likewise writ commanding and directing the respondent No.2 to produce the record related with the order Annexure P/1 for just and proper decision of the present case. ASHISH TIWARI Digitally signed by ASHISH TIWARI Date: 2025.04.15 15:48:14 +0530 -2- 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may be kind enough in issuing a writ in the nature of certiorari, mandamus or any other likewise writ commanding and directing to quash the order Annexure P/1 and the W.P.(S) No.465/2013 may kindly be directed to be restored to its original number for its final decision and adjudication. 10.3 Any other relief, which the Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an oral assurance was given to the petitioner by respondent authority to look into the grievance of the petitioner. Therefore on such assurance, the WPS 465/2013 was placed before the Lok- Adalat and the petitioner inadvertently withdrew the same. He further submits that the relief claimed for the grievance of the petitioner as projected in WPS No. 465/2013 has not been decided on merits, therefore, challenging order passed by the Lok-Adalat dated 26/07/2014, this writ petition is filed. He further submit that due to bonafied mistake, the writ petition was withdrawn and therefore, for the present writ petition has been permitted to make an application to the Lok- Adalat for recall of the order dated 26/07/2013 passed in WPS No. 465/2013. 3. Not opposed by the counsel for the respondents. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the appended documents. 5. Taking into the consideration the submissions, at this stage this writ petition is disposed of reserving the liberty in favour of the petitioner to make an application before the Lok-Adalat for recalling the order dated 26/07/2014 in WPS No. 465/2013. 6. With above observation, this writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- /-- (Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge Ashish