APHC010416632025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) SMS WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 21386 OF 2025 Between: 1. Bhojanapalle Sanjannagari Beesi Reddy, S/o B.S. Narayana Reddy, aged about 54 years, resident of H. No. 83-148, Boravelle Village, Jellapur Post, Manopadu Mandal, Jogulamba, Gadwal District - 509153, Telangana State. 2. Bondili Naveen Singh, S/o Bondili Balaji Singh, aged about 40 years, resident of H. No. 1-8-92/3, Varidyala, Kollapur Village and Mandal - 509102. Nagar Kurnool District, Telangana State. ...Petitioners AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi. 2. The District Collector, Kurnool District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kurnool.District. 4. The Tahasildar, Kallur Mandal, Kallur, Kurnool District. 5. The Mandal Surveyor, Kallur Tahasildar's Office, Kallur Mandal, Kurnool District. 6. The District Registrar, Kurnool District. 7. The Sub-Registrar, Kallur, Kurnool District ...Respondents / ■ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a direction, or an order, or a writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 in reducing the extent of the land of the petitioners from Ac. 4.95 cents to Ac. 2.55 cents in Sy. Nos. 377/2A and 377/2B of Chinnatekuru Village fields of Kallur Mandal of Kurnool District in the revenue records thereby depriving the petitioners from seeking the legal remedy under the provisions of A.P. Dotted Lands (Updation in Re-settlement Register) Act, 2017 and the Rules made thereunder since the Respondent No.2 put the total extent of the land of the petitioners in prohibitory list sent to the Respondent No.7 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional the action of the Respondent No.2 in putting the land of the petitioners under prohibition of Section 22-A(1)(a) of the Registration of Act instead of Section 22-A(1)(e) of the said Act as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional the action of the Respondent No.7 in refusing the sale deed of the petitioners by assigning the pending registration number P. No. 07/2025 through his Intimation of Refusal, dated 17.07.2025 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently to direct the Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 to correct the extent of the land of the petitioners from Ac. 2.55 cents to Ac. 4.95 cents in the revenue records, to direct the Respondent No.2 to delete the total extent of the land of petitioners land from the prohibitory list, and to direct the Respondent No.7 to process the refused document of the petitioners and to assign original registration number. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.7 to accept the registration of the Sale Deed in favour of the petitioners executed by their vendor in respect of Ac. 1.99 cents in Sy. No. 377/2A and Ac. 2.96 cents in Sy. No. 377/3B of Chinnatekuru Village fields of Kallur Mandal of Kurnool District, which was refused and assigned pending registration P. No. 07/2025 pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI KALEEMULLA S Counsel for the Respondent N6s. 1 to 5: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 6 & 7: GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS The Court made the following order: i. APHC010416632025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 0M0 [3330] 0?J^’ WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 21386/2025 Between: 1.BHOJANAPALLE SANJANNAGARI BEESI REDDY, S/0 B.S. NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, RESIDENT OF H. NO. 83-148, BORAVELLE VILLAGE, JELLAPUR POST, MANOPADU MANDAL, JOGULAMBA, GADWAL DISTRICT - 509153, TELANGANA STATE. 2.BOND1LI NAVEEN SINGH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, RESIDENT OF H. NO. 1-8-92/3, VARIDYALA, KOLLAPUR VILLAGE AND MANDAL - 509102, NAGAR KURNOOL DISTRICT, TELANGANA STATE. S/0 BONDILI BALAJI SINGH, ...PETITIONER{S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, PRINCIPAL SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI. 2.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, , KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3.THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, , KURNOOL.DISTRICT. 4.THE TAHASILDAR, KALLUR MANDAL, KALLUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5.THE MANDAL SURVEYOR, KALLUR TAHASILDAR'S OFFICE, KALLUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 6.THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, , KURNOOL DISTRICT. 7.THE SUBREGISTRAR, KALLUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a direction, or an order, or a writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 in reducing the extent of the land of the petitioners from Ac. 4.95 cents to Ac. 2.55 cents in Sy. Nos. 377/2A and 377/2B of Chinnatekuru Village fields of Kallur Mandal of Kurnool District in the revenue records thereby depriving the petitioners from seeking the legal remedy under the provisions of A.P. Dotted Lands (Updation in Re-settlement Register) Act, 2017 and the Rules made thereunder since the Respondent No.2 put the total extent of the land of the petitioners in prohibitory list sent to the Respondent No.7 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional the action of 2 Ik the Respondent No.2 in putting the land of the petitioners under prohibition of Section 22-A(1)(a) of the of Section 22-A(1)(e) of the said Act unconstitutional the action of the Respondent No.7 in refusing the sale deed of the petitioners by assigning the pending registration number P. No. 07/2025 through his Intimation of Refusal, dated 17.07.2025 illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently to direct the Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 to correct the extent of the land of the petitioners from Ac. 2.55 cents to Ac. 4.95 cents in the revenue records, to direct the Respondent No.2 to delete the total extent of the land of petitioners land from the prohibitory list, and to direct the Respondent No.7 to process the refused document of the petitioners and to assign original registration number, and to pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC Registration of Act instead as illegal, arbitrary and as praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleasedto direct the Respondent No.7 to accept the registration of the Sale Deed in favour of the petitioners executed by their vendor in respect of Ac. 1.99 cents in Sy. No. 377/2A and Ac. 2.96 cents in Sy. No. 377/3B of Chinnatekuru Village fields of Kallur Mandal of Kurnool District, which was refused and assigned pending registration P. No. 07/2025 pending disposal of the above writ petition,and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.KALEEMULLAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE 2.GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.21386 of 2025 ORDER:- The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief/s: “...to issue a direction, or an order, or a writ, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos.4 and 5 in reducing the extent of the land of the petitioners from Ac. 4.95 cents to Ac.2.55 cents in Sy.Nos.377/2A and 377/2B of Chinnatekuru Village fields of Kallur Mandal of Kurnool District in the revenue records thereby depriving the petitioners from seeking the legal remedy under the provisions of A.P.Dotted Lands (Updation in Re settlement Register) Act, 2017 and the Rules made thereunder since the Respondent No.2 put the total extent of the land of the petitioners in prohibitory list sent to the Respondent No.7 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional; the action of the Respondent No.2 in putting the land of the petitioners under prohibition of Section 22-A(1)(a) of the Registration of Act instead of Section 22-A(1)(e) of the said Act as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional: the action of the Respondent No.7 in refusing the sale deed of the petitioners by assigning the pending registration number P.No.07/2025 through his Intimation of Refusal, dated 17.07.2025 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently to direct the Respondent Nos.2 to 5 to correct the extent of the land of the petitioners 5from Ac.2.55 cents to Ac.4.95 cents in the revenue records, to direct the Respondent No.2 to delete the total extent of the land of petitioners land from the prohibitory list, and to direct the Respondent No.7 to process the refused document of the petitioners and to assign original registration number, and to pass such other order or orders... ” Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for respondents. more 2. 4 % After arguing for some time, learned counsel for petitioners 3. urged this Court to permit the petitioners to file an application before the appropriate authority and the same be considered in accordance with law. 4. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, petitioners are permitted to file an application 5. before the competent authority within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On filing of such application the respondent-authorities are directed to examine the application and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of two (02) months thereafter, and communicate the said decision to the petitioners. With the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. 6. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any. shall stand closed. Sd/- N. NAGAiyiMA ISTRAR assistant R1 //TRUE COPY// - SECTION OFFICER To, 1- The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi. 2. The District Collector, Kurnool District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kurnool.District. 4. The Tahasildar, Kallur Mandal, Kallur, Kurnool District. 5. The Mandal Surveyor, Kallur Tahasildar's Office, Kallur Mandal, Kurnool District. 6. The District Registrar, Kurnool 7. The Sub-Registrar, Kaliur, Kurnool District. 8. One CC to Sri Kaleemulla S, Advocate [OPUCJ m t” BUT] 11. Two CD Copies District. a .? f i TF c HIGH COURT DATED;13/08/2025 ORDER WP NO. 21386 OF 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P., WITHOUT COSTS