- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18692 RPFC No. 152 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 152 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. MAHADEVI K @ RAMYA K WIFE OF MAHADEVAIAH H.S, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, 2. KUM RASHI DAUGHTER OF MAHADEVAIAH H S, AGED ABOUT 8 YEARS, SINCE MINOR REP BY HER NATURAL GUARDIAN/ MOTHER, SMT. MAHADEVI K @ RAMYA K. BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO. 803, 10TH MAIN, 4TH CROSS, MAHADESWARA BADAVANE, KUMBARAKOPPALU, MYSURU - 570 001. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAMA DEVI L, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: SRI. MAHADEVAIAH H.S SON OF LATE SIDDARAMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, NO. 23/3, 5TH MAIN, 20TH CROSS, BHUVANESHWARINAGAR, K.P. AGRAHARA, BENGALURU - 560 023. Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18692 RPFC No. 152 of 2024 AND ALSO WORKING, IN THE OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER (ELEC) BESCOM, NO. 48, NEAR INDIAN OIL PETROL PUMP, II MAIN ROAD, MAGADI MAIN ROAD, VINAYAKANAGARA, KAMAKSHIPALYA, BANGALORE - 560 079 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. TRIVIKRAM S, ADVOCATE) THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF FAMILY COURT ACT, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 03.07.2023 PASSED IN CRL.MISC. NO. 380//2021 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, MYSURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED U/S. 125 OF Cr.P.C. FOR MAINTENANCE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER When the matter came up yesterday, i.e., on 02.06.2025, learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the set of papers was not served on the respondent as there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Accordingly, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption 'Dismissal.' - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18692 RPFC No. 152 of 2024 2. Even on 28.04.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed after the Summer Vacation, 2025. 3. Today, in spite of the fact, the matter is listed under the caption 'Dismissal', there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter. Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE KTY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1