Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29184 (AP)

S. Mohan Reddy, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/19769/2018 · 2025-07-28

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010417642018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No: 19769/2018 Between: 1. S. MOHAN REDDY,, S/O. BAYA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC.AGRICULTURE, RESIDENT OF D.NO. 1/1135/17G, NEAR PANCHAYATRAJ ROAD, KADIRI, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 3. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, KADIRI, ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KADIRI RURAL ( INCHARGE NP KUNTA POLICE STATION), KADIRI, ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NP KUNTA POLICE STATION, KADIRI, ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M JAYARAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.19769 OF 2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF CERTIORARI calling for the records pertaining to the proceedings of 3rd respondent in C.No.59/GENL- Ref/SDPO-K/2018 dated.14.02.2018 and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under Constitution of India also contrary to A.P.Police Standing Orders in the interest of justice and pass…” 2. Earlier, it was represented that the petitioner’s counsel is no more. 3. Notice was taken to the writ petitioner returned unserved as “no such person”. No one come forward to prosecute the writ petition. 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 29.07.2025 Pmk 4 47 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:19769 OF 2018 Date: 29.07.2025 Pmk