Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT O^ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WP(AT) NO: 1181 OF 2021 Between: B. Kiran Prasad, adopted son of Smt. Late Polasi Siddamma, aged 23 years. Unemployee, R/o. H.No. 19-4-35, STV Nagar, Tirupathi, Chittoor District, State of Andhra Pradesh-517 501. ...PETITIONER AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration A.P. Secretariat at Velagapudi, Guntur District. Andhra Pradesh. 522001. The Tirupathi Municipal Corporation, rep by its Commissioner, Tirupathi Chittoor District, State of A.P.517001. The Additional Commissioner, Tirupathi Municipal Corporation, Chittoor District, State of A.P. 517001.
2.
3. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to declare the impugned Endorsement in File No. MCT- ESTOCMO/2/2017-SUPDT3(ADMIN)MCTCHITTOOR, DATED 27-3-2017, issued by the 3rd respondent wherein rejecting the claim of the applicant for compassionate appointment on the ground that the adoption deed is not registered, as illegal arbitrary and contrary to the Rules made under G.O.Ms No. 612, GAD (Ser-A), Dated 30-1.0-1991, and contrary to the Provisions of Hindu Religion and the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 and set aside the same consequently direct the respondents herein to consider the candidature of the applicant for compassionate
appointment in place of Polasi Siddamma deceased sweeper in Tirupathi Municipal Corporation, and further direct the respondents to release pension and other death benefits of the deceased mother to the applicant. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI K. RAMALINGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES IV The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010417972021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION TRANSFERED FROM APAT NO: 1181/2021 Between: ...PETITIONER B Kiran Prasad AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K RAMALINGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GPFOR SERVICES IV The Court made the following:
ORDER: Sri Satya Dev Naidu,
learned counsel representing Sri K. Ramalingeswara Rao. learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and the Writ Petition (AT) has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition (AT) is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. Sd/-V.DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To
1. One CC to Sri K. Ramalingeswara Rao, Advocate [OPUC]
2. TwoCCsto GP for Services IV, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
3. Three C.D. Copies. Cnr
HIGH COURT DATED:21/01/2025
ORDER WP(AT).No.1181 of 2021 5 2 5 FEB 2C23 | . Current Section * o DISMISSING THE WP(AT) AS INFRUCUTOUS WITHOUT COSTS