SIYA RAM GARG S/O SHRI SUNDER LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/13567/2025 · 2025-09-08
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29175 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29175 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:35806] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13567/2025
1. Siya Ram Garg S/o Shri Sunder Lal, Fair Price Shopkeeper For Nagar Palika Basedi, Distt. Dholpur (Raj).
2. Annapurna Mahila Sahakari Samiti Ltd., Basedi Dholpur Through Manger Mukesh Sharma S/o Shri Khaderu, Fair Price Shopkeeper For Nagar Palika Basedi, Distt. Dholpur (Raj).
3. Bheemsen S/o Shri Rameshwar, Fair Price Shopkeeper For Nagar Palika Basedi, Distt. Dholpur (Raj).
4. Satyendra Singh S/o Shri Vijay Pal, Fair Price Shopkeeper For Nagar Palika Basedi, Distt. Dholpur (Raj). ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Food, Civil Supply And Consumer Matters Department, State Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. District Collector (Supply), Dholpur.
3. District Supply Officer, Dholpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Keshav Kumar Agrawal For Respondent(s) : Ms. Abhilasha Vaishnav for Mr. Lokendra Singh Rao, Dy. G.C.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 08/09/2025
1. The present petition pertains to allotment of fair price shop. The competent authority is stated to be concerned District Collector or any officer authorised by him.
2.
Learned counsel Ms. Abhilasha Vaishnav on behalf of Mr. Lokendra Singh Rao, Dy.GC has taken a preliminary objection that the matter primarily pertains to policy and there are different factual
[2025:RJ-JP:35806] (2 of 2) [CW-13567/2025] disputes which can be addressed before the competent authority. However, learned counsel is agreeable to the fact that the contentions or grievances of the petitioners herein can be heard within a period of 15 days by the competent authority i.e. District Collector. It is submitted that after giving due audience and considering the representation of the petitioners, appropriate speaking order will be passed by the competent authority.
3. In light of the submissions made by learned counsel, this Court deems it proper to dispose of the present petition with a direction that the petitioners or aggrieved parties mark their appearance before the concerned District Collector as per the recommendation of Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Wadhwa Committee (more specifically in para-19 of the said report) on 17.09.2025 at and around 11:00 am and after giving due audience, speaking order will be passed by the competent authority.
4. This Court makes it clear that till passing of orders, the allotment of the shop qua the disputed site will be kept in abeyance; passing of this order will not cause any prejudice to either of the sides.
5. The present petition is accordingly, disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed.
6. Appropriate remedy will be available to the petitioners, if they are aggrieved by the order passed by the District Collector.
(SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/12