Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
(105)
LACHHAMI DEVI AND OTHERS
RAMESH AND OTHERS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL
Present:- None for the appellants.
Mr. Sanjeev Pabbi, Advocate, ‘ for respondent No.3.
**** VIRINDER AGGARWAL
1.
No one has appeared on behalf of the appellant to the appellants answered with the report that seems that appellants are not interested in pursuing the appeal.
2.
In view of the above and given the prevailing circumstances, there seems to be no justification to keep the appeal on the docket, indefinitely. Accordingly, the instant appeal stand liberty to the appellants to revive the same, if have any grievance from this
order, within a period of three months from today.
3.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, are also disposed of accordingly
11.08.2025 S. Pathania
Whether reasoned / speaking?
Whether reportable?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
FAO
Date of Decision:
LACHHAMI DEVI AND OTHERS
Versus RAMESH AND OTHERS
-.- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL None for the appellants. Mr. Sanjeev Pabbi, Advocate, ‘ for respondent No.3. **** AGGARWAL, J. (Oral) No one has appeared on behalf of the appellant s as per the order dated 17.05.2017 and the same was returned answered with the report that appellants are not residing at given address seems that appellants are not interested in pursuing the appeal. In view of the above and given the prevailing circumstances, there seems to be no justification to keep the appeal on the docket, indefinitely. Accordingly, the instant appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution with liberty to the appellants to revive the same, if have any grievance from this
order, within a period of three months from today. ending miscellaneous application(s), if any, are also disposed of
(VIRINDER AGGARWAL)
Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable?
Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO-1610-1995 (O&M) Date of Decision:-19.08.2025
… Appellant
... Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL No one has appeared on behalf of the appellants. Notice was issued 017 and the same was returned are not residing at given address. It seems that appellants are not interested in pursuing the appeal. In view of the above and given the prevailing circumstances, there seems to be no justification to keep the appeal on the docket, indefinitely. s dismissed for want of prosecution with liberty to the appellants to revive the same, if have any grievance from this
order, within a period of three months from today. ending miscellaneous application(s), if any, are also disposed of (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE Yes / No Yes / No
. Notice was issued 017 and the same was returned . It In view of the above and given the prevailing circumstances, there seems to be no justification to keep the appeal on the docket, indefinitely. s dismissed for want of prosecution with liberty to the appellants to revive the same, if have any grievance from this ending miscellaneous application(s), if any, are also disposed of SAURAV PATHANIA 2025.08.19 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document