Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29175 (KAR)

SRI HALAGEGOWDA v. SRI KARI GOWDA

RSA/1682/2012 · 2025-06-20

Anant Ramanath Hegde

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21550 RSA No. 1682 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1682 OF 2012 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: 1. SRI HALAGEGOWDA, S/O LATE RUDREGOWDA,AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, 2. SRI SANNAPPAJIGOWDA, S/O LATE RUDREGOWDA,AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, 3. SRI SANNAPPAGOWDA, S/O LATE RUDREGOWDA,AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, 4. SRI KUNTEGOWDA, S/O LATE RUDREGOWDA,AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, APPELLANT NO.1 TO 4 ARE RESIDING AT NADAPPANAHALLI CHUNCHANAKATTE HOBLI, K R NAGARA TALUK-571617. 5. SMT. SHIVAMMA, W/O SRI DODDEGOWDA,AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, KOMALAPURA, BETTADAPURA HOBLI, PERIYAPATNA TLAUK-571102. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI SAMPATH KUMAR P, ADVOCATE - (ABSENT)) AND: SRI KARI GOWDA, S/O KEMPEGOWDA,AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, RESIDING AT NADAPPANAHALLI, CHUNCHANAKATTE HOBLI, K R NAGARA TALUK-571617. Digitally signed by C HONNUR SAB Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21550 RSA No. 1682 of 2012 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI ARUN L, ADVOCATE FOR SRI RAJAGOPALA NAIDU, ADVOCATE) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 12.4.2012 PASSED IN R.A.NO.452/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, MYSORE, DISMISSING THE APPEAL FILED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 2.6.2011 PASSED IN O.S.NO.562/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN) & JMFC., K.R.NAGAR. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: [ CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE ORAL JUDGMENT There was no representation when the case was called on 14.03.2025, 05.06.2025 and 12.06.2025. Even today when the case is called there is no representation in the morning session as well as in the afternoon session. 2. Appeal is of the year 2012 pending for admission. 3. No grounds to adjourn the matter. 4 . Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE BRN/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 40