Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29174 (PNJ)

SURAJ PANGHAL v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/11171/2025 · 2025-03-28

Anoop Chitkara

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-11171-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-11171-2025 Reserved on: 18.03.2025 Pronounced on: 28.03.2025 Suraj Panghal ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. Sandeep Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen K. Sheoran, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Chanderhas Yadav, Advocate for the complainant. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. 1. For detailed order, see order of even date passed in CRM-M-10382-2025 titled as “Mohit Lather Versus State of Haryana”. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 28.03.2025 Jyoti Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No. 1 Jyoti Sharma 2025.04.02 10:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh