1 2025:CGHC:44484 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5305 of 2023 1 - Dhiraj Pathak S/o Shri Mahavir Pathak Aged About 37 Years Presently Working On The Post Of Teacher (L.B.) English Subject Posted At Govt. Girls Middle School Thadpathar Block - Odagi Distt. - Surajpur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Department Of School Education Department Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar Nava Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector - Surajpur Distt. - Surajpur (C.G.) 3 - District Education Officer - Surajpur Distt. - Surajpur (C.G.) 4 - Block Education Officer - Odagi Distt. Surajpur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. A. N. Pandey, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ashutosh Shukla, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 01/09/2025 ABHIGYA SAXENA Digitally signed by ABHIGYA SAXENA 2 1. This petition is preferred against orders dated 23.06.2023 and 30.09.2022. 2. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- "10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari for quashing order dated 23.6.2023 ANNEXURE P/1 issued by the respondent no.1 in respect of petitioner. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari for quashing of transfer order dated 30.9.2022 (ANNEXURE P/2). 10.3 Any other relief or reliefs may also be granted to the petitioner which this Hon'ble court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case." 3. Vide order dated 01.08.2023, the petitioner was granted stay by this Court. 4. Considering the aforesaid aspect of the matter and considering the fact that on the strength of the aforesaid stay order, the petitioner is still continuing at his original place of posting, as such, by the afflux of time the said orders, has lost its efficacy and as such the orders dated 23.06.2023 and 30.09.2022 are required to be quashed and accordingly the said order under challenge is hereby quashed. 5. However, liberty is granted to the respondent State authorities to pass appropriate orders in respect of transfer of the petitioner, in 3 case exigency arises, without being influenced by this order. 6. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Saxena