IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (Cr). No.1052 of 2023 ------ Shailendra Kumar Tiwari aged about 32 years S/O Bishwanath Tiwari, Resident of Kalyanpur, Singh more, Birsa Chouk, Hatia, P.O. & P.S. Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Gunjan Priya W.O Shailendra Tiwari, Resident of Tiwari Main Market, Birsa Chowk, P.O. + P.S. Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi. At present, Resident of Gandhi Nagar, P.O. Gandhi Nagar, P.S. Gonda, District- Ranchi .... .... .... Respondents With W.P. (Cr). No.854 of 2023 ------ Anita Devi @ Anita Dubey, aged about 33 years W/O Santosh Dubey, D/O Bishwanath Tiwari, resident of Amir Mahal, Chhotki Delaha, Old Bal Niketan School, P.O. & P.S. Delha, District- Gaya, Bihar. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Gunjan Priya W.O Shailendra Tiwari, Resident of Tiwari Main Market, Birsa Chowk, P.O. + P.S. Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi. At present, Resident of Gandhi Nagar, P.O. Gandhi Nagar, P.S. Gonda, District- Ranchi .... .... .... Respondents With W.P. (Cr). No.871 of 2023 ------ 1. Baijayanti Devi @ Subhadra Devi aged about 53 years W/O Bishwanath Tiwari 2. Bishwanath Tiwari @ Biswanath Tiwari, aged about 55 years S/O Late Srikantamani Tiwari 3. Kajal Kumari @ Puja aged about 27 years D/O Bishwanath Tiwari All resident of Kalyanpur, Singh More, Birsa Chowk, P.S. Jagarnathpur, P.O. Hatia, District- Ranchi (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Gunjan Priya W.O Shailendra Tiwari, Resident of Tiwari Main Market, Birsa Chowk, P.O. + P.S. Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi. At present, Resident of Gandhi Nagar, P.O. Gandhi Nagar, P.S. Gonda, District- Ranchi. .... .... .... Respondents With W.P. (Cr). No.433 of 2024 ------ Shrish Chandra Dubey @ Shishir Dubey aged about 39 years Son of Sri Ramanuj Dubey, Permanent resident of village Ubb Aurangabad, P.O. & P.S. Obra. District- Aurangabad, Bihar. Present residing at Bhatti Complex, Pillar No.104, Saralpur, P.S. Salapur, P.O. B Sector 110, Maharsi Nagar, Noida, U.P. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Dy. S. P. Hatia, P.O. & P.S. Hatia, District- Ranchi. 3. Officer in-charge, Jagarnathpur, Police Station, P.O. & P.S. Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi. 4. Priti Kumari I/O; S.I. of Police Jagarnathpur, P.O. & P.S. Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi. 5. Gunjan Priya, W/O Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, D/O Yogendra Upadhyay, Resident of village- Morabadi, Edalhatu, P.O. & P.S. Bariyatu, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. .... .... .... Respondents With W.P. (Cr). No.507 of 2024 ------ 1. Kajal Kumari @ Puja Kumari, aged about 28 years W/O Sirish Dubey, Resident of Ubhaegya, P.O. & P.S. Obra, District- Aurangabad (Bihar) 2. Bajiyantri Devi @ Subhadra Devi aged about 53 years W/O Bishwanath Tiwari 3. Biswnath Tiwari aged about 55 years S/O Late Srikant Mani Tiwari Both Resident of Kalyanpur, Singh More, Birsa Chowk, P.O. & P.S. Jagarnathpur, Hatia, District- Ranchi (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Dy. S. P. Hatia, P.O. & P.S. Hatia, District- Ranchi. 3. Officer in-charge, Jagarnathpur, P.O. & P.S. Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi. 4. Priti Kumari I/O; S.I. of Police Jagarnathpur, P.O. & P.S. Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi. 5. Gunjan Priya, W/O Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, D/O Yogendra Upadhyay, Resident of village- Morabadi, Edalhatu, P.O. & P.S. Bariyatu, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. .... .... .... Respondents ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : None For the Respondents : Mr. Devesh Krishna, SC (MINES) III Mr. Rajendra Prasad Gupta, Advocate Mr. Avishek Prasad, Advocate Mr. Faisal Allam, Advocate Mr. Ashutosh Anand, AAG III Mr. Binit Chandra, AAG III Mr. Manoj Kumar, GA III Mr. Deepankar, AC to GA III ------ Order No.10 Dated- 17-02-2025 Heard the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. No one turns up on behalf of the petitioners in spite of repeated calls. Learned counsels appearing for the respondents submit that since there is no merit in these W.Ps. (Cr.), hence, the petitioners are not diligent in prosecuting these W.Ps. (Cr.). Accordingly, these W.Ps. (Cr.) are dismissed for non-prosecution. In view of disposal of these W.Ps. (Cr.), the interim relief granted in respective W.P. (Cr.), is vacated. Registry is directed to intimate the court concerned forthwith. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/