Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2916 (CHH)

SMT. ANUSUIYA BAI v. PAWAN KUMAR TANDAN

MAC/191/2020 · 2025-01-14

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

-1- 2025:CGHC:2338 NAFR HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 191 of 2020 1 - Smt. Anusuiya Bai W/o Hemant Satnami Aged About 50 Years, 2 - Ku. Chitrarekha D/o Hemant Satnami Aged About 22 Years, 3 - Hupendra Kumar S/o Hemant Satnami, Aged About 20 Years, All R/o Village Kanharpuri, Ward No. 33, Rajnandgaon, Tehsil And District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. (Claimants ). ... Appellant(s) Versus 1 - Pawan Kumar Tandan S/o Amruram Tandan R/o Village Makkatola, Police Station Chichola, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. (Driver of Tata As -C G-08- B-2335) (Respondent No. 01 ), District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Santosh Kumar Banjare S/o Firturam Banjare, R/o Village Makkatola, Police Station Chichola, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. (Owner of Tata As -C G-08- B-2335) (Respondent No. 02 ), District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Through - Branch Manager, Branch office - Near Railway Station , Rajnandgaon, Tehsil And District - Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. (Insurance Company) (Respondent No. 03). 4 - Smt. Nandani Banjare W/o Late Tarun Banjare, Aged About 25 Years, 5 - Mayank S/o Late Tarun Banjare Aged About 5 Years, & 6 - Nayan Kumar Banjare S/o Late Tarun Banjare, Aged About 2 Years, Respondents No. 5 & 6 are Minors, Through The Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Nandani Banjare, W/o Late Tarun Banjare, All R/o Village - Kanharpuri, Satnami Para, Tehsil & District - Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. (Respondents No. 04, 05 And 06 ). ... Respondent(s) Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE -2- For Appellant(s) : Mr. Anuj Pandey, Advocate, holding the brief of Mr. Shaleen Singh Baghel, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mrs. Swati Agrawal, Advocate, holding the brief of Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 14.01.2025 1) At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would seek permission of this Court to withdraw this appeal with liberty to take recourse to law. 2) No objection from the other side. 3) Permission granted. 4) Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as stated above. Certified copy, if any, be returned after retaining its xerox copy. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nadim