Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29159 (JHR)

JITENDRA KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/941/2023 · 2025-01-10

Rajesh Shankar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.941 of 2023 ----- Jitendra Kumar, S/o Late Munna Bhaghat, R/o Road No.3, Near Sainik Model School Vidhyanagar, P.O. & P.S.-Doranda, District-Ranchi. .......... Petitioner. -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Amitabh Kausal, Secretary, Department of Land Reforms and Revenue, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi. 3. Rahul Kumar Sinha, Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi. 4. Raj Kumar, Circle Officer, Hehal, Ranchi. 5. Munsi Ram, Circle Officer, Sadar, Ranchi. .......... Opp. Parties. ----- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Tripathi, Advocate For Opp. Parties : Mr. Shubham Gautam, A.C. to A.A.G.-V ----- Order No.20 Date: 10.01.2025 1. The present contempt case has been filed for initiating contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for their wilful and deliberate violation of the order dated 23rd January, 2023 passed in W.P. (C) No.3186 of 2021. 2. Mr. Shubham Gautam, learned A.C. to A.A.G.-V, appearing on behalf of the opposite parties, while producing a copy of the order sheet of Case No.2214 of 2020-21 also containing the order dated 13th December, 2024, submits that vide the said order, the petitioner’s application seeking mutation of the land in question in his name has been rejected. 3. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering that the opposite party no.4 has already passed the order dated 13th December, 2024 in Case No.2214 of 2020-21 rejecting the petitioner’s application seeking mutation of the land in question in his name, there is no need to further proceed in the matter. The contempt proceeding as against the opposite parties is hereby dropped. 4. The present contempt case is stands disposed of. 5. The petitioner is, however, at liberty to take appropriate recourse as available under law against the order dated 13th December, 2024 passed by the opposite party no.4. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) Vikas/ -2- Cont. Case (Civil) No.941 of 2023