Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29156 (AP)

B. Ramesh Naik, v. The Society for Elimantion of Rural Poverty(SERF),

WP/20157/2019 · 2025-08-20

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010416792019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 20157/2019 Between: 1. B. RAMESH NAIK, S/O KRISHNA NAIK, AGED 34 YEARS, R/O 7-58, GAJULAVARIPALLI TANDA, KURUMAAMIDI POST, GANDLA PENTA MANDAL, ANATHAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE SOCIETY FOR ELIMANTION OF RURAL POVERTYSERF, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, 2ND FLOOR, PNBS RTC BUS COMPLEX, NTR ADMINISTRATIVE BLOCK, VIJAYAWADA-13. 2. STREE NIDHI CREDIT COOPERATIVE FEDERATION LIMITED, DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, 2ND FLOOR, PNBS RTC BUS COMPLEX, NTR ADMINISTRATIVE BLOCK, VIJAYAWADA-13. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. RAVITEJA PADIRI 2. The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.20157 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT of MANDAMUS being aggrieved by the action of the Respondents in illegally not considering the petitioners dated 21.10.2019 for seeking rejoin of service as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and contrary to Articles 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and besides violation of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the Respondents consider the petitioners representation dated 21.10.2019 and pass…” 2. Learned counsel representing Sri S.Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the writ petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned Additional Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. Recording the submissions made by the learned for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 21.08.2025 Pmk 3 15 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:20157 OF 2019 Date: 21.08.2025 Pmk