MANISH BHATI S/O SHRI MANGTURAM BHATI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLR/1580/2025 · 2025-09-03
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29155 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29155 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:35169] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1580/2025 Manish Bhati S/o Shri Mangturam Bhati, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Plot No. 120, Scheme No.3, Basant Vihar, Alwar (Rajasthan). (At Present Confined In Central Jail Alwar, District Alwar (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
2. Guljari Lal S/o Shri Khemchand, Aged About 46 Years, R/o C-661, Buddh Vihar, Alwar, District Alwar (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Krishan Kumar Chhawal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, P.P. Mr. Dushyant Singh Naruka HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order 03/09/2025 The present revision petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 438 r/w Section 442 of B.N.S.S., 2023 against the
order dated 22.08.2025 passed by learned Additional District & Sessions Judge No.3, Alwar, whereby the application filed by the accused-petitioner for deposit the amount of Rs.4,35,000/- in compliance of order dated 17.03.2025, was dismissed.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the application for suspension of sentence was allowed by the learned Appellate Court vide order dated 17.03.2025, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall deposit 20% amount i.e. 4,35,000/- within a period of two months. However, due to the
[2025:RJ-JP:35169] (2 of 2) [CRLR-1580/2025] financial hardship, the petitioner could not deposited the same and therefore, the time period was further extended by one month, but still petitioner failed to deposit the amount. The petitioner moved an application for further extension of time, and same came to be dismissed by learned Appellate Court vide its order dated 17.06.2025. Counsel further submits that the petitioner is now ready and willing to deposit the aforesaid amount. Therefore, the present revision petition may kindly be allowed. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. Looking to the overall facts & circumstances of the case & considering the submissions made at bar, the revision petition is allowed subject to the condition that the petitioner shall deposit the aforesaid amount i.e. 4,35,000/- on or before 20.09.2025 in compliance of order dated 17.03.2025 passed by learned Appellate Court. Consequently, the present revision petition is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J SAURABH /42