- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21801 WP NO.17622 OF 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.17622 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: A.P. SWAMY S/O PUTTASWAMYGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O ANGATAHALLI VILLAGE, HANAGODU VILLAGE, HUNSUR TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 105. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ROHITH B.J., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER HUNSUR, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 105. 3. THE TAHASILDAR HUNSUR, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 105. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA) Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21801 WP NO.17622 OF 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 20TH MARCH, 2025 VIDE ANNEXURE- E AND EFFECT TRANSFER OF KHATA IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER ON THE BASIS OF EARLIER MUTATION ORDER BEARING MR. NO.1/1993-94 IN RESPECT OF THE LAND IN QUESTION VIDE ANNEXURE-B. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Smt. Navya Shekhar, learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondent No.3 to consider the representation dated 20th March, 2025 (Annexure-E) filed for change of Khata in favour of the petitioner on the basis of earlier Mutation order bearing M.R. No.1/1993-94 (Annexure-B) in respect of the land in question. 3. Heard Sri. Rohith B.J., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Smt. Navya Shekhar, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents. 4. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on perusal of the writ papers, the same would - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21801 WP NO.17622 OF 2025 indicate that the respondent-Authorities have changed the mutation entries in respect of the land in question during the year 1996-97. In that view of the matter, it is open for the petitioner to challenge the same, if so advised, in a manner known to law. With this observation, writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 45