[2025:RJ-JP:536] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14416/2023 Gajendra Kumar Soni Son of Shri Rodu Lal Soni, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Devra Gali, Sunel, Pirawa District Jhalawar. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director (Non Gazetted), Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Jhalawar Hospital And Medical College Society, Jhalawar Through Its Principal And Controller. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dharmendra Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prakhar Jain for Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 06/01/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the judgment of Rajendra Kumar Beniwal vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. registered as S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14080/2023 decided vide judgment dated 16.11.2023 and has submitted that the instant matter can be adjudicated in the light of Rajendra Kumar Beniwal (Supra). Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection qua the same. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and the consensus drawn inter-se between them, this [2025:RJ-JP:536] (2 of 2) [CW-14416/2023] Court deems it apposite to dispose of the instant matter in terms of the ratio spelled out in Rajendra Kumar Beniwal (supra) which is reproduced as under:- “A. All the representations shall be properly organized by the State to have a proper and elaborate consideration of the same. B. In case any of the petitioner has failed to file the representation, it shall be open for the petitioner who has filed the writ petition upto 16.11.23 by the advertisement for the recruitment of Nursing and Paramedical Officers etc. may file such representation within a period of 20 days from today along with certified/web copy of this order. C. Such representations shall be considered by the State while keeping into consideration the policy decision taken by the State on 03.11.2023 and the deliberations regarding the issues in question. D. The State shall be required to take a considered stand on each of the broader controversy before publishing the final select list, after considering the grievance raised in such representations. E. It shall be open for the petitioners to approach this Court again after the State has applied its mind on the representations and passed appropriate speaking orders strictly in accordance with law. F. The State shall strictly adhere to the Rule 19 of the Rules of 1965 while deciding all these representations. G. The decision taken by the State shall be uploaded on the website. H. In case any issue beyond the policy decision dated 03.11.2023 also remains, the petitioners shall be at liberty to file representations today along with certified/web copy of this order, which shall also be considered appropriately by the respondent-State. I. In case the matters come back to this Court, it shall be open for the both parties to raise all their issues as this Court has not entered into the merits of the controversy while passing today’s order.” In view of the above, the instant petition is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J ANIL SHARMA /325