APHC010417402011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 23267/2011 Between: 1. A.V.SATYANARAYANA, S/O.SATYAM WORKING AS MANAGER, SRI RAMESWARA SWAMY TEMPLE, ACHANTA, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT R/O.ACHANTA ...PETITIONER AND 1. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER ENDT DEPT ANOTHER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, ELURU, W.G.DISTRICT 2. THE COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, A.P.BOGGULAKUNTA, TILAK ROAD, HYD ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings Rc.No.B3/1883/2011-17, dated 16.07.2011 issued by the first respondent and the consequential fixation of Seniority in the seniority list prepared in proceedings Rc.No.b3/1883/2011-1, dated 16.07.2011 by the first respondent by counting the seniority of the petitioner from 01.06.1995 instead from 01.04.1989, as illegal, arbitrary, against the rules issued in G.O.Ms.No.1479 Revenue (Endts.VI) Department, dated 17.11.1986 and the guidelines issued by the second respondent in U.O.Note in Rc.No.D2/751/2011, dated 10.02.2011 and set aside the same consequentially direct the respondents to count the seniority of the petitioner from 01.04.1989 in the category of Junior Assistant with all consequential benefits flow there including grant of appropriate place in the seniority list and promotion etc. IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 28487 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents to count the seniority of the 2 petitioner in the category of Junior Assistant from 01.04.1989 for giving appointment to the post of Executive Officer Grade-III. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V S S S RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 23267 of 2011 ORDER: Despite the matter listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner. It evinces that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting his case. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date : 04.07.2025 SPP 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Writ Petition No:23267 of 2011 Date : 04.07.2025 SPP