2025:HHC:30824 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 1856 of 2025 Decided on : 09.09.2025 Sh. Ravi Dutt …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 4. Mr. Ramesh Chand Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.4 & 5. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) When this case was taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that interest of justice would be served, in case, this petition is disposed of with the direction that if no order, till date, has been taken on Annexure P-8 i.e. the representation preferred by the petitioner against the seniority list, then same be decided expeditiously. 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:30824 2. As the prayer made is innocuous, therefore, without any observation on the merit of the case, this petition is disposed of with the direction that in case no decision, till date, has been taken on Annexure P-8, then needful be done, within a period of six weeks from today, after hearing the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge September 09, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)