1 2025:CGHC:3993 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 711 of 2024 1 - The Governing Body (Constituted Under Statute 28 Of College Code Of C.G. Vishwavidyalay Adhinium 1973 Of D.P. Vipra College) Through The Secretary To The Governing Body Office Of Principal, D.P.Vipra College Old Higher Court Road, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Principal D. P. Vipra College Old High Court Road Bilaspur Chhattigarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary To The Govt. Of Chhattisgarh Department Of Higher Education Mantrtalaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur P. S. Rakhi, Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Subir Sen S/o Shri R. B. Sen Aged About 60 Years R/o 17/361, Sarju Bagicha, Azad Nagar Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Inquiry Officer D. P. Vipra College Old High Court Road Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. --- Respondents For Petitioner : None. For Respondent : None. Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order On Board 22.01.2025 1. The applicants have filed present application for extension of time in respect of order dated 31.05.2024 passed by this Court in WP(S) No. 2951/2022 and affirmed by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 05.07.2024 in Writ Appeal No. 420/2024. 2. Since the SLP(C) Diary No. 36635/2024 has been disposed of by the Hon’ble Supreme Court on 21.10.2024. The operative part of the order reads as under:- “20. Accordingly, the writ petitions are allowed in part. The respondents No. 2 and 3 are directed to allow the petitioners to join their duties as Assistant Professors with continuity of service but without back wages, reserving liberty to the respondents to proceed further in accordance with law, if they ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Digitally signed by ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Date: 2025.01.23 11:03:33 +0530 2 so desired. 21. It is made clear that this Court has not examined whether the enquiry is proper or not or the petitioners have been given proper opportunity of hearing or not to defend themselves or whether the petitioners have committed any misconduct or not. All these questions are kept open and it will be considered and decided if exigency so arises.” “4. We find merit in the submission of the learned senior counsel. 5. We clarify that the liberty reserved in paragraphs 20 and 21 as extracted above, will survive. 6. With the above observations and directions, the special leave petitions are disposed of.” 3. Accordingly, the instant MCC is disposed of in view of the disposal of the SLP(C) by Hon’ble the Supreme Court. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Arun