IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-3944-2001 Date of Decision: 14.07.2025 Surinder Kumar and another ......Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: Ms. Promila Nain, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Raman Sharma, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. K.S. Gill, Advocate, for Mr. Dhiraj Chawla, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India are seeking setting aside of action of respondent No.3 whereby they were orally told that their services would not be availed after March’ 2001. 2. Mr. Raman Sharma, Addl. A.G., Haryana submits that services of petitioners were not availed after March’ 2001. 3. There was no stay in favour of the petitioners and as stated by Mr. Raman Sharma their services were not availed after March’ 2001. 4. Ms. Promila Nain, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that she has no instructions. She may be granted liberty to move an appropriate application within 3 months, if cause survives. 5. Dismissed with aforesaid liberty. 14.07.2025 (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) shivani JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking Yes Whether reportable No Shivani Gupta 2025.07.14 16:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document