- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23261 WP No. 18215 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 18215 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI.SEETHARAGHAVA SOUHARDA SAHAKARA BANK NIYAMITHA BUS STAND ROAD, HOSADURGA CHITRADURGA DIST - 577 527 REPRESENTED BY BRANCH MANAGER …PETITIONER (BY SRI. S LAKSHMINARAYANA.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE-560 001. 2. SRI. RAJASHEKAR B S S/O SATHYANARAYANA B R AGED ABOUT MAJOR. 3. SMT.SHYLA C W/O RAJASHEKARA B S AGED ABOUT MAJOR Sl. No.2 & 3 ARE RESIDING AT, SRI VEERABHADRESHWARA NILAYA, SRI CHOWDESHWARI LAYOUT B.V.K.S, Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23261 WP No. 18215 of 2025 BHEEMASAMUDRA ROAD, CHITRADURGA TOWN - 577 501 4. SRI. LOKESH M S/O MALLIKARJUNAPPA AGED ABOUT MAJOR R/AT NEAR GOVT MIDDLE SCHOOL, BOMMAKKANAHALLI VILLAGE, HAYKAL POST-577 517 CHITRADURGA DIST. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI MOHMMED JAFFAR SHAH, AGA FOR R1) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE HONBLE PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT CHITRADURGA TO EXPEDITE TO PASS ORDER IN CRL MISC NO.49/2024 IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW IN ENDS OF JUSTICE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER In this petition, the petitioner has sought for writ of mandamus to conclude the proceedings in Crl.Misc. No.49/2024 initiated in terms of Section 15(1) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. It is submitted that proceedings are being - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23261 WP No. 18215 of 2025 prolonged unnecessarily, taking note of the same, the petition stands disposed of with a direction that the proceedings in Crl.Misc.No.49/2024 to be disposed of expeditiously. 2. The petitioner undertakes that he would co-operate with any enquiry as may be required. The petitioner is reserved with liberty for advancement of the proceedings and furnish clarifications in the event of any enquiry from the Court. 3. Liberty is reserved with the petitioner to seek revival, in the event grievance persists. Notice to respondents No.2 to 4 is dispensed with. In view of the above, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE HR