Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29134 (RAJ)

SANWARMAL S/O PREMDAS v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/1174/2025 · 2025-10-03

Avneesh Jhingan, Baljinder Singh Sandhu

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:40085-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) No. 1174/2025 Sanwarmal S/o Premdas, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Paldi, Police Station Sadar, District Bhilwara (At Present Serving His Sentence At Open Air Camp Sanganer, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Home, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Joint Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. The Prisoners Parole Advisory Committee (State Committee), Through Its Chairman, Director General Of Prisons, Rajasthan. 4. The Director General Of Prisons, Rajasthan, Directorate Prisons. 5. The District Magistrate, Jaipur. 6. Superintendent Central Jail, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anshuman Saxena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU Order 03/10/2025 1. This petition is filed seeking directions that considering the weak financial position the petitioner be released on permanent parole on furnishing of personal bond. 2. The brief facts are that the petitioner was convicted in Session Case No. 72/2012 and was sentenced for life imprisonment. The appeal against conviction was dismissed. The [2025:RJ-JP:40085-DB] (2 of 2) [CRLW-1174/2025] petitioner underwent incarceration of more than fourteen years, seven months and currently is in Open Air Camp Sanganer. 3. The application filed by the petitioner for release on permanent parole was allowed on 08.08.2025 and the petitioner was ordered to be released on furnishing of two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each and personal bond of the same amount. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no financial means to comply with the directions of furnishing two surety bonds but shall furnish personal bond. It is argued that the conduct of the petitioner in jail through out was satisfactory and had surrendered in time after availing parole on earlier occasions. 5. With the reply filed by the respondent, the financial status report is annexed as Annexure-R2 wherein, it is stated that there is no property in the name of the petitioner. 6. Considering the financial status report annexed with the reply, the order granting permanent parole to the petitioner is modified to the extent that the petitioner shall be released subject to furnishing of personal bond of Rs. 50,000/-. 7. The criminal writ petition (Parole) is allowed. (BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J RIYA/21