[2025:RJ-JP:37943] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11084/2025 Mukesh Kumar S/o Arjunlal, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Badwali Dhani Village Narottampura Tehsil/p.s. Kotkhawda, District Jaipur. At Present In Central Jail Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Mahesh Gurjar Mr. Abhishek Dadhich HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 17/09/2025 1. The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Mukesh Kumar S/o Arjunlal seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR no.219/2025 dated 08.08.2025 registered at P.S. Kotkhawada, District- Jaipur City (South), for the offence under Sections 126(2), 125, 189(2) and 115(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. The applicant does not have any criminal antecedents. He also submits that the [2025:RJ-JP:37943] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11084/2025] applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that due to road rage incident there was some altercation which resulted into an accident and a case has been registered but after arrest of petitioner accused, the parties have settled their dispute and they have entered into compromise which is placed on record. He also submitted that there is no criminal antecedent against the petitioner accused. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the allegations are grave and serious in nature. 5. Learned counsel for complainant acknowledged that the parties have settled their dispute and he submits that both injured Babulal and Mal Singh are present before this Hon’ble Court to verify the compromise. He also submitted that he has no objection if bail is granted to petitioner accused. 6. Heard learned counsel for the parties and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 7. Having considered the submission of learned counsel for parties and upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the [2025:RJ-JP:37943] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11084/2025] case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant-accused 8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicants-accused Mukesh Kumar S/o Arjunlal is hereby allowed and ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /127